Chat With The Chair
The very nice chair of my department came to talk to me today about
why my husband and I are not both going to participate in the next
department weekend function (my husband is still at a conference, so
the chair couldn't talk directly to both of us). I should say that I
am using the word 'nice' very sincerely -- the chair of my department
is truly one of the nicest people I have met in academia, and this is
all the more remarkable because he is a research superstar and an
excellent teacher.
In any case, he was troubled about the situation because, although he
understands the challenges posed by weekend commitments, he and his
wife always managed to work things out when their kids were young.
Sigh. His wife is also a professor, although they are in different
fields. There probably were times when they both had to be somewhere,
and I'm sure they managed just fine by hiring babysitters or whatever.
I told him that we had not been able to find a babysitter who could
take care of our child for 10 hours that weekend, that the concept of
paying to attend a long meeting on a weekend irked me, but, more
importantly, I thought that our department could take this opportunity
to be a bit more progressive than just the same-old way of doing
things. Why should we do things the same way as 20-30 years ago? Every
other science and engineering department at our university does things
the same-old way, and I guess we can too, but why? Wouldn't it be
great if our department did something to make participating in these
functions possible for faculty with young children?
I also pointed out that it wasn't particularly stressful for me to
attend or not attend, except in feeling left out of important
discussions, but had he considered how difficult it was for the
tenure-track faculty with kids? They feel they have to attend or
jeopardize their position in the department, so they are not going to
complain like I will.
In previous discussions with him, I'd mentioned my disgust at the lack
of women speakers in our departmental seminar series, and he had
agreed that there should have been some women invited. We talked about
this more today. For example, he has a very talented female graduate
student who is worried about her ability to get a faculty position, in
part because there are so few women in their research specialty. I
said "How do you think she and the other women grad students feel when
week after week, every seminar is by a prominent man and there are no
women at all?" He knows these things -- I really don't need to tell
him -- but I think he needs to feel them a bit more viscerally than he
does. I wonder if, because he is so nice and so respectful and so
supportive of women, that perhaps he can't see that not everyone feels
that way (?). I don't mean that he is unaware of discrimination, as
that is clearly not the case either, but somehow he doesn't *see* some
very obvious things. He let the male domination of the department
happen (both actively and passively), perhaps because he doesn't
notice these things?
I didn't really feel any better after talking to him, but I didn't
feel worse either. I feel thwarted -- I want to take action and change
things -- not just talk about them. I felt better after talking to my
favorite colleague, who always listens to my rants and who laughs at
my jokes and cheers me up, and who fortunately is here this week.
No comments:
Post a Comment